Stark County Queen Rearing

June 29, 2015

 

 

On Sunday May 31, Joe Heider and Laurene Kiel grafted from a survivor hive/cut-out (Sept.5, 2014, and wintered on a small cluster) in her apiary.  Poor conditions, torrential rains followed by several cold days, complicated both the grafting and the success rate.  Laurene used a Cloake Board method, due to limited resources, wherein two frames of brood and 2 frames of honey/pollen were placed on top of the graft donor hive, nurse bees moved up into this super and the Cloake board was closed 24 hours before grafting.  Joe provided a starter/finisher from his apiary.  A total of 18 were placed into the super with the Cloake board and 45 grafts went into the starter/finisher.

 

Temperatures dropped that evening with a cold wet rain, so the starter/finisher was insulated with a winter wrap.  The other (Cloake) starter/finisher above the donor colony was deemed to be warm enough so no additional insulation was given.  Both were given pollen patties and supplemental feed jars.Mid-week (3 days post-graft) cell bars were inspected and showed a 60% acceptance rate (queen cells drawn) with Joe's grafts and only 2 (of 18) with Laurene's. 

 

Laurene has grafted once before and used the Cloake board while Joe has grafted multiple times and his starter/finisher had a larger population.  On Sunday June 7 (7 days post graft) because of travel issues,  29 cells were caged and distributed between the two (20 to Joe's, 9 to Cloake).  Emergence date was to be Friday, June 12.  Saturday inspection of Joe's revealed: 2 dead, 4 did not emerge, and 14 alive/distributed.  Sunday inspection of the Cloake method finisher revealed: 1 did not emerge, 3 escaped from cages (who knows who the victor is?), and 5 alive (1 was very small).  N.B. 1 cell from Cloake was placed Sunday into hive made queenless.

 

Summary:

23/63 total grafts (37% viable queens)

I calculated this number based on distributed queens (14), 3 escapees,  1 ASSUMED success of cell in queenless hive, and 5 caged queens in Cloake finisher


Conclusions:

1) Weather/handling at inopportune times may have played a role in success

2) Experience/practice in grafting is important

3) The Cloake board method may be useful with an apiary with limited resources to raise a few queens (queen cell size was double that of those in the other starter/finisher).

4) When caging cells...DUCT tape DOES NOT ALWAYS work.  Make sure the cages are escape proof!
 

NOW all we need is NO rain for the mating flights!

 

 

 

 

Please reload

Recent Posts

January 25, 2020

Please reload

Archive
Please reload

Search By Tags